US Attacks on Iran: Senior Congress Leaders Criticise The Trump: The recent US military strikes on Iran ordered by President Donald Trump have sparked intense debate across the American political landscape. With top Democrats and some Republicans calling the strikes unconstitutional and dangerous, and others fully supporting Trump’s decisive action, this article covers the full spectrum of political reactions. From constitutional concerns raised by Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omar, and Nancy Pelosi to strong support from Lindsey Graham, Mike Johnson, and John Fetterman, the article explores the growing divide in US politics amid rising tensions in West Asia.
US Attacks on Iran: Senior Congress Leaders Criticise The Trump
In a highly controversial move that has ignited a fierce political debate, President Donald Trump’s recent military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities have drawn intense criticism as well as strong support from across the American political spectrum. The strikes, carried out without seeking prior approval from Congress, have raised serious constitutional questions and exposed deep divisions within both parties.
Several senior members of Congress have openly criticized the Trump administration for bypassing Congress before engaging in military action against Iran. Senator Bernie Sanders was among the most vocal critics, stating that only the US Congress has the authority to take the country to war and that the president does not have this power.
He described the military actions as grossly unconstitutional, emphasizing that such unilateral decisions are alarming and dangerous. Former Representative Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, echoed Sanders’ remarks. Massie, who previously co-sponsored a resolution aiming to block unauthorized military action in Iran, called the strikes unconstitutional and stressed that Congress alone holds the power to declare war.
Democratic Congressman Jim Himes of Connecticut, who serves on the Intelligence Committee, described the strikes as a clear violation of the Constitution. He reiterated that only Congress has the authority to declare war, expressing deep concern about the precedent set by Trump’s actions. Congressman Ro Khanna of California similarly condemned the president’s unilateral decision, warning that the United States risks being drawn into yet another war without the consent of its elected representatives. Ro Khanna emphasized that such unauthorized military engagements undermine the democratic principles on which the nation is built.
The backlash from the Democratic Party was particularly strong. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar stated that the strikes marked a dangerous and reckless escalation of an already volatile conflict in West Asia. She argued that rather than bringing peace, these military actions would only provoke more violence, death, and destruction.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi demanded answers from the Trump administration, accusing it of ignoring the Constitution and engaging the military without congressional authorization. Representative Sara Jacobs also slammed the strikes as unconstitutional, criticizing the government for risking involvement in another endless war that could drain American resources and cost countless lives.
Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost of Florida targeted Trump’s contradictory rhetoric, pointing out that while the president bombs Iran, he simultaneously calls for peace, a stance that Frost believes will inevitably lead to more death. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took an even stronger position, declaring that Trump’s impulsive actions provide clear grounds for impeachment. She warned that by risking a new war, Trump may entangle the United States in conflicts that could impact future generations.
Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries assigned full responsibility for any adverse consequences directly to President Trump. He accused Trump of failing to bring peace to West Asia and warned that the fallout from his actions could be severe. Representative Norma Torres added that by attacking a foreign nation without congressional approval, the president has not only violated international norms but also endangered American lives both at home and abroad.
While much of the criticism came from Democrats, several Republicans and a few Democrats stood firmly behind President Trump’s decision. House Speaker Mike Johnson defended the military operation, stating that it serves as a reminder to both American allies and adversaries that President Trump means what he says.
He stressed that a nuclear-armed Iran is an unacceptable threat and will not be tolerated. Senator Lindsey Graham applauded Trump’s decision, calling it the right move. Graham argued that Iran deserved the strikes due to its ongoing threats against the United States and Israel, and its persistent pursuit of nuclear weapons. Senate Majority Leader John Thune added that Iran’s commitment to bringing death to America and its intent to wipe Israel off the map leave no room for negotiation. He insisted that Iran’s nuclear ambitions must be stopped before they pose an even greater threat.
Surprisingly, some Democrats also expressed support for Trump’s military action. Congressman John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, breaking ranks with most of his party, described Iran as the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and insisted that Trump’s military strike was the correct course of action. Fetterman emphasized that firm and decisive action was necessary to confront Iran’s destabilizing activities.
As the immediate shock of the US airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites begins to settle, the political divide within the United States has become increasingly visible. On one hand, critics argue that Trump’s unilateral decision circumvents constitutional processes and risks triggering a full-scale war with potentially devastating consequences for global stability. On the other hand, supporters believe that Trump’s firm approach sends a strong message to Iran and its allies, reaffirming America’s resolve to defend its interests and those of its allies.
This latest development has added another layer of complexity to an already fragile situation in West Asia, raising serious questions about the future direction of US foreign policy, the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, and America’s role on the global stage.
Disclaimer:
This article is for informational and analytical purposes only. The content reflects the current political reactions and opinions expressed by various US lawmakers and does not represent the views or positions of the publisher. All information is based on publicly available statements and media reports. Readers are advised to follow official government sources and verified news outlets for updates on this developing situation. The publisher is not responsible for any consequences arising from the interpretation or use of this information.