India Slams Pakistan:India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Piyush Harish, delivered a strong rebuttal to Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar over his remarks on Kashmir and the Indus Waters Treaty at the UN Security Council. Harish called out Pakistan’s support for terrorism and contrasted India’s democratic and economic credentials with Pakistan’s extremism and IMF dependency. He also defended India’s Operation Sindoor as a focused, non-escalatory response to terrorism, and highlighted that military action ceased at Pakistan’s own request. The exchange occurred as Pakistan chaired the UNSC and pushed through a resolution on peaceful dispute settlement.
India Slams Pakistan at United Nations
In a fiery exchange at the United Nations Security Council, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Piyush Harish, delivered a strong and unequivocal response to Pakistan’s recent comments on Kashmir and the Indus Waters Treaty. The Indian envoy rebuked Pakistan’s attempts to internationalize the Kashmir issue and highlighted Islamabad’s long-standing record of supporting terrorism and religious extremism.
Responding to Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar’s statements, Harish drew a stark contrast between the two nations. “On one hand, there is India — a mature democracy, a surging economy, and a pluralistic and inclusive society,” said Harish. “And on the other, there is extremist Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF.”
The Indian representative emphasized that as the international community debates the promotion of peace and security, it is crucial to uphold universal values — most importantly, zero tolerance for terrorism. This principle, he said, must be respected by all UN member states without exception.
Harish also addressed the recent Indian military operation “Operation Sindoor,” launched in retaliation to the pahalgam terror attack. He clarified that India’s actions were targeted and non-escalatory in nature, aimed specifically at terrorist camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The operation, according to Harish, concluded at the request of Pakistan, reflecting India’s intention to avoid unnecessary escalation.
India’s strong diplomatic pushback came after Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, during his speech at the UNSC, claimed that Kashmir remains an internationally recognized disputed territory. He criticized India’s recent steps regarding the Indus Waters Treaty, calling them “regrettable and unjustified,” and urged the United Nations to push for a resolution of the Kashmir issue based on what he described as relevant Security Council resolutions.
India Slams Pakistan at United Nations:Adding to the diplomatic drama, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution pushed by Pakistan, calling for the peaceful settlement of international disputes. This resolution was one of Pakistan’s two signature initiatives during its current tenure as the rotating president of the Security Council.
India Slams Pakistan at United Nations:The resolution, while not legally binding, was adopted during a session chaired personally by Ishaq Dar in New York. It highlights growing concerns over unresolved conflicts that threaten global peace and underscores the importance of proactive international cooperation. The resolution is intended to set a global norm, apply political pressure, and lay the groundwork for potential future UN actions, especially in crisis prevention and conflict resolution.
India Slams Pakistan at United Nations:As tensions flared during the session, it became clear that the longstanding issues between India and Pakistan — particularly around Kashmir and cross-border terrorism — remain unresolved and continue to be flashpoints in international diplomacy.
India Slams Pakistan at United Nations:Correspondent Susan Tehrani reported from New York, covering the adoption of the UNSC resolution and the intense diplomatic exchanges that followed.
Disclaimer:
India Slams Pakistan at United Nations:This article is based on publicly available information, official statements, and media reports. It is intended for informational and editorial purposes only. The views and interpretations expressed are those of the respective speakers and sources quoted. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and consider multiple perspectives before forming conclusions